Independent editorial coverage of research and its place in societyinfo@europeanscience.uk-en.com
European ScienceResearch journal
Archive special issue

Trust in research

How confidence is built, challenged and renewed in publishing, institutions and public conversations about science.

Special Issue
Colleagues reviewing notes and research material together
Trust grows through clear evidence, accountable practice and open exchange.
Issue introduction

Trust is central to the way research is communicated, evaluated and used. This archive issue brings together perspectives on the relationships between evidence, institutions, publishing and public life.

Periods of economic and institutional pressure can make questions of trust especially visible. Researchers, readers, policy communities and publishers all depend on clear processes and credible information when decisions need to be made.

The articles collected here examine trust in academic publishing, including digital tools intended to support research practice and the importance of making study findings available whether results are favourable, mixed or inconclusive.

The issue also considers institutions and policy processes: how transparency, competing interests and communication shape confidence in public decision-making. Its final group of articles turns to public trust in science, with attention to risk communication, social relevance and the ways research is understood beyond specialist settings.

Reading the archive

This issue was first published in 2015. It is presented here as an archive collection; its topics remain useful starting points for considering how scientific work earns and maintains confidence.

Articles in this issue

Editorial

Considering the everyday elements of trust

An editorial reflection on the assumptions and small signals that affect confidence.

Publishing

Digital routes to rebuilding trust in academic publishing

A look at the practical role of online services in research communication.

Publishing

When publication omits unfavourable findings

Why a fuller research record matters for evidence-based decisions.

Policy

Confidence, scrutiny and policy-making

An examination of the pressures that shape public policy discussions.

Policy

Transparency questions in nanotechnology policy

How regulatory processes and stakeholder interests can affect public confidence.

Science in society

Risk perception and building public confidence

Perspective on communication approaches for complex areas of public concern.

Science in society

Science, social relevance and public trust

Questions about how social and economic connections influence perceptions of science.

Science in society

Public confidence in science across Europe

An archive perspective on longer-term patterns in attitudes to scientific work.

Editorial approach

How we read questions of trust

01 — Context

Locate the issue

We connect individual debates to the research, policy and social settings around them.

02 — Evidence

Examine the record

Articles foreground the importance of accessible information and clear distinctions.

03 — Exchange

Allow for scrutiny

Trust depends on space for questions, explanation and accountable discussion.

04 — Archive

Keep perspective

Earlier writing can illuminate the longer conversations that shape research culture.